Saturday, September 29, 2012

GATTACA and beyond, but high school students get left behind.



Worryingly, this may be the limit of some students' knowledge about genes (Credit: http://www.offthemark.com/cartoons/genetics)

I consider myself very lucky that I get to work with academics at the cutting edge of science research, as well as with high school students and teachers.

While I get to peer into both the world of university and the world of high school, I appreciate the huge chasm that exists between these two worlds and the lack of communication between them. Academics who teach university students don’t really know what their students have studied in their subjects at high school, and conversely, school teachers don’t know what will be expected of their students at uni. This is a serious problem, considering that more than 50% of high school graduates proceed to study at university.

It’s becoming increasingly obvious that the current syllabuses for science are worryingly outdated compared with our current knowledge and research focuses. As schools get ready to introduce a new Australian curriculum over the next few years, it will be interesting to see how much “new” genetics students will be required to learn.

It is understandable that high school science syllabuses can’t keep up with all new discoveries as they happen. It takes time to develop a new syllabus, and even more time for teachers to become familiar enough with a syllabus to be able to teach it confidently.

Nevertheless, for genetics and molecular biology in particular, there is a shamefully long lag time between the publication of discoveries in scientific articles and when they finally feature in school text books.

High school genetics is, unfortunately, stuck in a strange time warp. Techniques, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), don’t even rate a mention in today’s HSC Biology syllabus, despite revolutionising the field of genetics when it was developed in 1983.


The absence of any reference to PCR in the HSC Biology syllabus means that Year 12s will sadly never appreciate lame genetics cartoons like this one (Credit: http://www.yalescientific.org/tag/cartoon/)

The limit of many students’ understanding by the end of Year 12 is that blue eye colour is determined by whether you have one or two copies of the recessive allele. Most students have no appreciation that characteristics encoded by a single gene locus are the exception rather than the rule, and some characteristics can be encoded by hundreds of different gene loci.

While students learn about the Darwin’s theory of evolution, they are totally unaware of recent major paradigm shifts in genetics, such as the emergence of epigenetics in the early 2000s. Epigenetics is the study of the dynamic system that encodes gene expression in a cell, and provides a mechanism to explain how environmental effects on phenotype can be inherited from generation to generation. I dare say that even most high school teachers, let alone their students, are unaware that Lamarck’s theories have enjoyed this new lease on life.

More advanced concepts, such as the Human Genome Project and gene cloning, are covered in the genetics option module in the HSC Biology syllabus. However, few schools select to teach this option to their students, because it is more difficult than the other option modules.

I can appreciate that genetics is a difficult subject to study for many students, and sometimes a difficult subject to teach. However, I don’t think the solution is to teach content that is so simplified and watered down that it is almost irrelevant and incorrect. The result is students who really struggle to study any sort of genetics or molecular biology in first year university.

I really hope to see a properly updated genetics section of the Australian Biology curriculum when the final draft is released. It may also require some significant professional development for teachers to update them on our current understanding of genetics. Finally, it will be crucial to update the new syllabus every year or two to incorporate new examples of current research, to ensure we don’t end up with the problem of a syllabus that is up to 20 years out of date in 20 years time.